All questions
AP Physics C: Mechanics
5.6 Newton’s Second Law in Rotational Form
5.4 Rotational Inertia
5.3 Torque
IntermediateMCQConceptual19.6k
A front-view schematic of a rotational dynamics apparatus. At the center is a fixed horizontal axle represented by a small filled circle. Mounted on the axle is an irregularly shaped planar rotor with a smooth, closed, asymmetrical curved boundary. Concentric with the axle is a smaller circular hub of radius \(r\), shown with a dashed radial segment labeled \(r\). A vertical line representing a light string tangentially leaves the right edge of the circular hub and extends straight downward. Suspended from the bottom end of the string is a rectangular block labeled \(m\). A straight downward arrow next to the block indicates the direction of motion. No other labels, lines, text, or axes appear.
Experimental setup with an irregularly shaped rotor, coaxial hub of radius \(r\), and hanging block of mass \(m\).
An experiment is conducted to determine the unknown rotational inertia \(I\) of an irregularly shaped rotor mounted on a fixed horizontal axle.

A light string is wrapped around a cylindrical hub of radius \(r\) fixed coaxially to the rotor, and a block of mass \(m\) is suspended from the free end. The block is released from rest and descends with a constant downward acceleration \(a\), and the student calculates \(I\) from the measured acceleration using the frictionless model \(I = m r^2 \left(\dfrac{g}{a} - 1\right)\).

If the axle bearings exert an unmodeled, constant frictional torque \(\tau_f\) that opposes rotation, how does the student's calculated rotational inertia compare to the true rotational inertia of the rotor, and what is the physical justification?

Log In to Continue

Accounts are free! Log in to try this question, see explanations, save progress, and more!

Tools for a 5